Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Bounce | enter | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
| Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
| Golgari Obliterator | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Dimir Midrange | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Dimir Midrange | arianne | 7-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765757 |
| Golgari Midrange | vitorcarvalho01 | 7-2 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | strongmind | 7-2 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | hamuda | 6-1 | None |
| Dimir Bounce | oafmcnamara | 7-3 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765769 |
| Dimir Bounce | rastaf | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
5 Color Legends , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Faeries , Dimir Flash , Dimir Midrange
Meta Performance Analysis
Gix's Command ranks #368 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 91%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 74.5%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Gix's Command is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 10.50 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 5 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.1%. Gix's Command has a win rate of 71.6%, making it 2.0% worse than other 5-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Royal Treatment | Instant | 17 | 75.7% | 8 |
| Analyze the Pollen | Sorcery | 20 | 70.1% | 3 |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 8 | 69.4% | 3 |
| Faerie Dreamthief | Creature — Faerie Warlock | 61 | 66.4% | 6 |
| Qarsi Revenant | Creature — Vampire | 6 | 66.3% | 1 |
| Lumbering Worldwagon | Artifact — Vehicle | 21 | 64.2% | 10 |
| Deduce | Instant | 5 | 63.5% | 0 |
| Wrenn and Realmbreaker | Legendary Planeswalker — Wrenn | 14 | 63.3% | 1 |
| Loran of the Third Path | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 18 | 63.0% | 3 |
| Zoraline, Cosmos Caller | Legendary Creature — Bat Cleric | 6 | 62.5% | 2 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Gix's Command than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lumbering Worldwagon | Artifact — Vehicle | 3 | 5 | 100.0% | 85.8% | +14.2% |
| Surrak, Elusive Hunter | Legendary Creature — Human Warrior | 3 | 8 | 86.7% | 74.5% | +12.2% |
| Heritage Reclamation | Instant | 2 | 7 | 84.8% | 73.0% | +11.8% |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 25 | 82.6% | 73.6% | +9.0% |
| Unholy Annex/Ritual Chamber | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 8 | 23 | 82.2% | 73.8% | +8.4% |
| The End | Instant | 4 | 7 | 83.3% | 75.0% | +8.3% |
| Shoot the Sheriff | Instant | 2 | 16 | 84.8% | 77.3% | +7.6% |
| Nissa, Ascended Animist | Legendary Planeswalker — Nissa | 7 | 18 | 80.6% | 73.1% | +7.5% |
| Harvester of Misery | Creature — Spirit | 5 | 20 | 83.0% | 75.7% | +7.3% |
| Archfiend of the Dross | Creature — Phyrexian Demon | 4 | 16 | 80.2% | 73.5% | +6.7% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 1872 | 90.4% | 52.8% |
| Golgari Midrange | 688 | 88.5% | 46.2% |
| Golgari Demons | 481 | 88.3% | 47.3% |
| Dimir Bounce | 439 | 88.9% | 52.5% |
| Esper Pixie | 103 | 6.6% | 49.5% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.